Request microsoft cd

A subpoena or its local equivalent is required to request non-content data, and a warrant, court order, or its local equivalent, is required for content data. Number of warrants from U. The below are frequently asked questions concerning requests we receive from law enforcement agencies around the world.

Additional information and FAQs related to Microsoft policies and procedures for responding to government requests for data can be found in the Data Law blog. The Microsoft mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more, and all of our technologies are designed to further that mission.

We place a premium on respecting and protecting the privacy of our customers, and work to earn their trust every day. At the same time, Microsoft recognizes that law enforcement plays a critically important role in keeping our customers—and our technology—safe and free from abuse or exploitation. We are hopeful that this data disclosure can better inform all sides in the critically important public discussion about how best to strike the balance between the privacy of our customers and the legitimate needs of law enforcement agencies that protect and serve their citizens.

Governments play a critical role in keeping the public safe. They continue to have those legal means today. At the same time, we believe our customers deserve predictability in how and when a government can access their data, and it should be up to national laws and international human rights standards — not the discretion of any company — to determine where the line is drawn.

By only responding to valid legal process, we strive to offer customers clear expectations for what happens with their data. As our law enforcement requests reports have shown, the overwhelming majority of requests seek information related to our free consumer services.

By comparison, we have received very few requests for data associated with our commercial services used by enterprise customers. We require at least a subpoena before turning over non-content records, such as basic subscriber information or IP connection history, and we require a warrant or its equivalent before producing content.

Irish law and European Union directives apply to the Hotmail and Outlook. As our report shows, every year we reject a number of law enforcement requests. Challenges to government requests can take many forms. In many of these cases, we simply inform the requesting government that we are unable to disclose the requested information and explain our reason for rejecting the request. We also, where it is appropriate, challenge requests in court.

There are many reasons why Microsoft may reject or challenge a request. For example, we might reject a request if it is facially invalid, improperly served on us, or requests data of a type not supported by the order or of the incorrect technology company. We may reject requests when they exceed the authority or jurisdiction of the requesting agency. We may reject a request if it is not signed or not appropriately authorized, contains the wrong dates, is not properly addressed, contains material mistakes, or is overly broad.

We may also reject requests when no legal reason exists why the government cannot seek the data from enterprise customers themselves, rather than from Microsoft. Our Global Human Rights Statement outlines our commitment to respect the universal human rights of our customers.

By verifying law enforcement entities followed the laws and procedures in their jurisdictions before we respond to a request, we seek to ensure we are disclosing customer data only in authorized criminal investigations.

Microsoft produces data in response to valid legal requests from governmental entities in countries where Microsoft Corporation is located.

We conduct a local legal review of each request we receive against both the local laws and standards and our own standards. We also periodically review our screening processes around the world to ensure we are following local judicial procedures and applying our Global Human Rights Statement.

Non-content data includes basic subscriber information, such as an email address, name, state, country, ZIP code, and IP address at time of registration. Other non-content data may include IP connection history, an Xbox Gamertag, and credit card or other billing information.

We require a valid legal demand, such as a subpoena or court order, before we will consider disclosing non-content data to law enforcement. Content is what our customers create, communicate, and store on or through our services, such as the words in an email exchanged between friends or business colleagues or the photographs and documents stored on OneDrive formerly called SkyDrive or other cloud offerings such as Office and Azure.

We require a warrant or its equivalent before we will consider disclosing content to law enforcement. We do not provide any government with direct access to emails or instant messages, nor do we provide government access to customer data on a voluntary basis.

Like all providers of communications services, we are sometimes obligated to comply with lawful demands from governments to turn over content for specific accounts, pursuant to a search warrant or court order.

Some documents disclosed in the summer of were interpreted to suggest we made product changes to enable greater government access to customer communication. There were significant inaccuracies in the interpretations of these leaked government documents, and the product changes referenced did not facilitate greater government access to audio, video, messaging, or any other customer data.

We believe that you should control your own data. Microsoft does not give any government including law enforcement, or other government entities direct or unfettered access to customer data. Microsoft does not build backdoors into any of its products.

We do not design tools to enable voluntary surveillance of our customers. If we ever provide third parties with access to data about our customers, we expect those third parties to handle that data appropriately, meaning that they should not assist governments in voluntary, widespread surveillance of customers. Instead, these third parties should ensure that they only disclose personal data about customers in compliance with applicable law or in response to valid legal orders.

The US law, Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, does not currently apply to many Microsoft services, including Skype, because they are not considered telecommunications services. Details on the encryption deployed in our products are regularly updated and can often be viewed by visiting the website associated with that product. Many of our products use end-to-end encryption or deploy encryption extensively.

We invest in encryption because it protects our customers from a range of threats including cybercrime. However, sometimes our customers wish to deploy technologies to fight cybercrime that require content to be decrypted in a secure environment somewhere in the process. For example, some customers may wish to run enterprise software that scans emails to detect phishing attacks or malicious code.

Customers may also wish to take advantage of features like real-time language translation in Skype calls, which require us to temporarily and securely decrypt data. Our approach is to give customers choices while continuously working to improve encryption and other security measures so they can be applied broadly. However, in many circumstances we also offer the option for consumers or enterprises to keep their own keys, in which case Microsoft does not maintain copies.

All government requests for data, including any that were accompanied by non-disclosure orders, also known as secrecy orders, are included in our transparency reports. Microsoft has a long history of successfully challenging unnecessary secret surveillance, both directly in communications with law enforcement and formally in court.

Microsoft has also advocated in Congress to reform the US non-disclosure order statute, 18 U. Microsoft requires official, signed, legally valid process issued pursuant to federal or local law and rules. Specifically, we require a subpoena or its equivalent before disclosing non-content, and only disclose content to law enforcement in response to a warrant or its local equivalent.

Moreover, Microsoft redirects the government to seek data from enterprise customers themselves when legally permitted. All law enforcement requests arrive at Microsoft through a secure portal, for which only vetted law enforcement agencies receive access. Once Microsoft reviews the demand and determines that it must provide data, the data specified in the valid legal order is provided to law enforcement through the same, secure portal.

We do this only in limited, defined circumstances. On occasion, we also report some limited information about a user when we have reason to believe the individual is about to harm themselves or someone else due to a public posting on one of our forums, on Xbox LIVE, or through referrals from other customers.

If one of our customers or employees, or Microsoft itself, is the victim of a crime, we may report some limited information to law enforcement. Additionally, consistent with applicable law and industry practice, Microsoft sometimes discloses limited information to law enforcement where we believe the disclosure is necessary to prevent an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to a person. We rarely have money for that. But for this record no, it has those dang curly braces and is missing the "GUID" letters.

I wonder why. I'm now convinced this is the crux of my problem. I know this is hard to convey via text only. I wrote a short blog about that here:. Can you please post the entirety of the message you are receiving? It will find something in that is in that table. I'm not sure yet if me changing the IsRevoked to zero helped. There are another three that don't have "GUID:" in the front. In the Devices listing panel, right-click on the column label bar and add the columns of Blocked and ID if you haven't already.

Sort by the Blocked column so that the value of "Yes" is at the top of your list will make it easier to find. Find the client in question, right-click on the row containing the client and in the resulting selection box, select "Unblock" to unblock this client. Considering you state the GUID is in a different format that your other clients, it may be a good idea to locate the offending box and figure out what may be causing this.

But what I've described here will unblock that client, if that is what you are after. I'm thinking this might be a situation to open up a case. I checked the ClientKeyData table within my lab's database and found one instance of a squiggly bracketed record but not in a revoked state.

After a bit of work, I could find no connection between this record and any other table. Considering you've already used the unsupported method to change the value of the Revoked field, I'd let it sit for a while to see if the message clears out. If you feel like digging around in the database to see if you can find a link, here's a query to pull tables having a specific column name.

I'd love to give credit to wherever I found this query, but it's been a while and I can't remember where I found it. Also, try and stick to the Views.

Just unblock it and the message will be gone. Select the status corresponding to your release definition and then select Save. For more information on customizing your status policy, see Configure a branch policy for an external service. With the new status policy added, users won't be able to merge any changes to the target branch without a "succeeded" status is posted to the pull request. You can view the status of your policies from the pull request Overview page. Depending on your policy settings, you can view the posted release status under the Required , Optional , or Status sections.

The release status gets updated every time the pipeline is triggered. Enabling status checks for a GitHub repository allow an administrator to choose which criteria must be met before a pull request is merged into the target branch.

Check out the Branch protection rule GitHub article to learn how to enable status checks for your GitHub repository. The status checks will be posted on your pull request only after your release pipeline has run at least once with the pull request deployment condition Enabled.

You can view your status checks in your pull request under the Conversation tab. Skip to main content. This browser is no longer supported. Download Microsoft Edge More info.